The Scaling Mechanism
Account Federation & Interface Hierarchy
The platform is designed to scale vertically—from family apps to regional aggregate monitoring consoles—through a multi-tier federation loop. National-scale rollout, staffing, and regulation sit outside what a solo-built prototype can claim today; grant support targets the end-to-end demo of that architecture.
Level 1: Consumer Edge
Status: Live consumer PWA
Teenology PWA Consumer Entry Point
An autonomous, standalone consumer utility deployed outside institutional environments. Parents interact with the platform as a client-side assistant: private diary, offline psychoeducational cards, and a prevention-focused AI companion (not clinical therapy).
Data Isolation Perimeter
Data persists entirely inside the browser's IndexedDB and passes to Level 2 (Specialist Terminal) solely via explicit, cryptographically signed user-consent loops during urgent escalation pathways.
teenology.care (fund demo) →
Sign in once — Companion access activates automatically (no promo code).
Level 2: Professional Node
Specialist Workspace & Prevention AI Assistant
The school psychologist and program coordinator workspace. The system automates document generation from raw text inputs (field notes, observation timelines). The current core build supports three end-to-end operating modes, bounded by the PIE ontology, RAG contour, and primary non-clinical prevention scope. The next development step is structured document “digital twins”: report forms mirrored by checkbox matrices that turn qualitative observations into atomic data units for Level 3 macro analytics.
1. Quick consultation (Consultant)
Operational chat assistant for theory, methodology, and rapid analysis of school or group incidents. Responses stay within taxonomy boundaries without mandatory export to official forms.
2. Methodological expertise (Expert)
Deep audit of uploaded documents or complex case review. The AI produces in-chat analysis and compiles a downloadable .docx aligned with standardized professional report templates.
3. Document architect (Architect)
Step-by-step wizard for plans and reports with automatic table and heading markup across four UI categories: Consultations, Individual support plans, Group work, and Safe-environment programs.
«Digital Twin» Document Registry (.DOCX Compilation Target)
Each text form has a strict digital twin—a parameter matrix (X_STAGE / Y_LEVEL / M_MODALITY). Checkbox completion verifies the document and turns qualitative reports into anonymized mathematical vectors (data atoms) for BigQuery:
Expert Module:
• Clinical Psychological Report (Universal intake / SOAP structure)
• FBA (Functional Behavioral Assessment, A-B-C matrix) & BIP (Behavior Intervention Plan)
• MDR (Manifestation Determination Review: misconduct vs. disability link)
• Automated Independent Educational Plan (IEP) & Methodological Audit
Architect Module (Plans & Reports):
• Individual Consultation: Individual Consultation Plan / Consultation Summary Report
• IOP: Individualized Prevention Plan (IPP) / Progress Monitoring & Implementation Report
• Group Sessions: Group Session Lesson Plan / Group Intervention Summary Report
• Safe Environment: School-wide Prevention Program Plan / Program Evaluation & Outcomes Report
* Context bridge: modes connect seamlessly. After an FBA-style analysis or Expert review, the specialist transfers context to Architect in one click to auto-assemble an updated targeted prevention program.
Level 3 & 4: Governance Surface
Territorial Prevention Dashboards & Macro Analytics Ingestion
Status: In Architectural Design
The upper administrative layer for school principals, municipal centers, regional departments, and national regulators. It operates only on depersonalized statistical aggregates. Confidentiality invariant: no student lists, personal names, case files, or free-text narratives. To reduce re-identification risk, analytics suppress small cells (fewer than five cases per bucket).
L2 — School principal / Center lead
• Specialist workload: Balance of psychologist time and staffing gaps.
• Risk dynamics: Aggregated incidents and leadership requests without names.
• Effectiveness: Overall impact of support measures within the organization.
L3 — District / Regional department
• Risk epidemiology: Seasonal and local patterns (e.g., a spike in social maladjustment or anxiety markers triggers a targeted program).
• Program coverage: Map of schools supplied with methods and prevention activities.
L4 — National level / Regulator
Macro view across prevention in education and public health—strategic planning, workforce norms for specialists, and society-level trend monitoring.
Cross-cutting KPIs and aggregation axes (data pipeline schema)
| Indicator |
Meaning for leadership |
| Intensity & reach |
Count of logged prevention actions and total participants in group programs. |
| Time balance |
Staff hours by activity type (intake, individual work, family sessions, groups). |
| Situation profile |
Structured coordinates from first identification through outcome evaluation. |
| Risk reduction coefficient |
Primary effectiveness metric: anonymized share of cases with sustained local well-being improvement. |
* Decentralized trust: no “global admin backdoor.” Rights flow down via invite codes: National → Region → School → Specialist terminal. Revoking an invite stops new data flow and isolates historical archives.